Posted on

HOWARD DEAN (cont.)

Share

development of more than 200 drugs and vaccines.

Some policymakers have argued that some of those medicines are not adequately available to the public because of their high prices. They believe the government should 'marchin' and require licensing of the patents behind those drugs so generic drug manufacturers can produce cheaper competing versions.

This is ironic, given that we are finally administering vaccines to end the pandemic. Without taxpayer support for early-stage research at universities, drug companies would have never been in a position to create lifesaving vaccines so quickly.

Drug companies won't spend the billions of dollars it takes to commercialize federally funded research if there's a risk the government will seize the fruits of their research. The result will be fewer new treatments for patients.

Consider what happened in 1989, when the National Institutes of Health adopted a policy calling for 'reasonable'

that licensed patents that benefited from government funding. The number of licensing agreements between universities and companies plummeted.

In 1995, NIH-funded research led to just 32 licensing agreements with private companies. That same year, the agency eliminated the pricing clause. Not surprisingly, the number of licensing agreements in 1996 more than doubled, to 87.

If the government takes away patent rights, then less federal research will be commercialized — and fewer new medicines will hit the market. That's not an outcome that's in the interests of patients.

The people of the United States need and deserve access to affordable medicines. But it is incredibly important to not destroy innovation in one of the last industries in the world where the United States still has a real edge.

Howard Dean is the Former Chair of the Democratic National Committee and Former Governor of Vermont.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LAST NEWS
Scroll Up